Tbilisi Railway Bypass Project: Georgia, Railway Modernization
Tbilisi’s completed railway bypass project, a €360 million undertaking, modernized infrastructure, eased congestion, and spurred urban renewal. Railway sector news highlights this successful model for urban revitalization.

Tbilisi Railway Bypass Project: A Technological and Urban Revitalization
The Tbilisi Railway Bypass Project, completed in 2013, stands as a significant example of large-scale railway infrastructure modernization designed to alleviate urban congestion and unlock significant land for redevelopment. This project aimed to relocate the existing railway line traversing the heart of Tbilisi, Georgia, thereby resolving critical issues stemming from obsolete railway infrastructure impacting urban development and creating opportunities for economic growth. The project’s scope encompassed the construction of a new bypass route, the decommissioning of outdated railway yards and stations, and the repurposing of reclaimed land. This analysis will delve into the project’s technical aspects, financial considerations, construction methodologies, environmental impact, and ultimately assess its success in achieving its ambitious goals. The detailed examination will highlight the complexities inherent in such a large-scale undertaking and provide insights into the strategic planning and execution necessary for successful railway modernization projects within urban environments.
Project Overview and Justification
By 2008, approximately 10 million tons of crude oil and petroleum products were annually transported through Tbilisi’s city center. This heavy reliance on a railway network characterized by obsolete terminals, sidings, and yards created significant bottlenecks, hindering urban expansion and economic progress. The city’s existing rail infrastructure was not only inefficient but also posed safety risks and presented significant obstacles to urban planning initiatives. The bypass aimed to comprehensively address these problems by removing the railway from the city center, freeing up substantial land for redevelopment, and significantly improving the city’s overall transportation network. The relocation of the oil transit corridor between Tbilisi Central Station and Didube Station alone was projected to release approximately 73.2 hectares of valuable urban land.
Financial Structure and Stakeholders
The Tbilisi Railway Bypass Project carried a substantial price tag. The estimated total cost was €360 million (approximately $499.1 million USD at the time). Georgian Railway secured a significant portion of the funding through the issuance of five-year Eurobonds worth $250 million, managed by Bank of America Merrill Lynch and JP Morgan. Further financial support was obtained from international financial institutions, namely the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and the European Investment Bank (EIB), contributing up to €100 million after approval in April 2010. This blend of private and public funding demonstrates a commitment to the project’s long-term viability and its significance in Georgian national development strategy.
| Project Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Project Length | Approximately 6km |
| Project Cost | €360 million ($499.1 million USD) |
| Project Type | Railway Bypass and Light Rail Integration |
| Cities Connected | Mtskheta, Tbilisi, Rustavi, Gardabani |
| Number of Stations (Planned) | Tbilisi Central, Airport, Rustavi |
| Main Contractor | Consortium of Hidmsheni and China Railway 23rd Bureau Group |
| Design Consultant | Kievgiprotrans (KGT) |
Construction and Engineering Challenges
The construction phase involved a complex series of engineering tasks. This included dismantling the existing railway track between Didube and Navtlughi stations, along with associated infrastructure like shunting areas, yards, sidings, and depots. The project necessitated the decommissioning of Tbilisi Central Station while rehabilitating Didube and Navtlughi stations to serve as the new western and eastern passenger termini. The new bypass route incorporated significant tunneling through challenging terrain. A 2.5km tunnel was excavated to circumvent Zahesi and Gldani villages, followed by a 1.2km tunnel to bypass Giorgitsminda and Mukhiani residential areas. The alignment also required careful consideration of existing utilities, including gas, water, sewage, and power lines. Maintaining a safe distance (minimum 900m) from the Tbilisi Sea presented another significant engineering challenge. The project further included the construction of a new freight station strategically located near the Kakheti railway line. The entire operation needed meticulous planning to minimize disruption to existing services during the transition.
Environmental and Social Impact Mitigation
A comprehensive Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) was conducted by a consortium of GDC Solution, Caucasian Environmental NGO Network (CENN), and the Association for Protection of Landowners Rights (APLR). The ESIA highlighted the project’s impact on the biodiversity of Tbilisi National Park, necessitating the development of a detailed mitigation plan and approval from the Ministry of Environment—a condition set by the EBRD. The proximity of the railway to the Tbilisi River, a primary source of drinking water, led to the inclusion of robust emergency response measures into the construction and operational plans. A resettlement action plan was developed to address the displacement of 22 families, and solutions were implemented to accommodate the 24 commercial companies utilizing sidings connected to the dismantled railway line. These initiatives demonstrate the project’s commitment to responsible development practices, balancing infrastructure needs with environmental protection and social equity.
Conclusions
The Tbilisi Railway Bypass Project successfully achieved its primary objectives of modernizing the city’s rail infrastructure, resolving urban congestion, and freeing up significant land for redevelopment. The project’s innovative approach involved integrating a light rail passenger system along the former oil corridor between Tbilisi Central Station and Navtlughi Station, connecting Mtskheta, Tbilisi, Rustavi, and Gardabani. This demonstrates a clear understanding of the relationship between transport infrastructure and sustainable urban planning. The project’s financial structure, combining private and public funding from Georgian Railway, the EBRD, and the EIB, reflects the project’s importance in national and regional strategic development and highlights the benefits of international collaboration in financing and managing such infrastructure projects. The successful execution of the project, despite the intricate engineering challenges and the necessity for significant environmental and social mitigation measures, underscores the importance of meticulous planning, robust risk management, and the engagement of diverse stakeholders. The project serves as a model for other cities facing similar challenges of outdated railway systems inhibiting urban growth and economic progress. The reclaimed land has provided opportunities for housing, commercial development, and green spaces, improving the quality of life for Tbilisi residents and contributing to the city’s overall sustainable development. The project’s success also highlights the critical role of international financial institutions in supporting large-scale infrastructure projects in developing countries.
Company Information:
- Hidmsheni: A Georgian bridge-building company.
- China Railway 23rd Bureau Group: A large Chinese state-owned construction and engineering company specializing in railways and other large-scale infrastructure projects.
- Kievgiprotrans (KGT): A Ukrainian engineering company providing design and consultancy services for railway and transportation infrastructure.
- Bank of America Merrill Lynch: A global financial services company.
- JP Morgan: A multinational financial services firm.
- European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD): An international financial institution promoting private sector development and economic integration in its regions of operation.
- European Investment Bank (EIB): The European Union’s long-term lending institution.
- GDC Solution, Caucasian Environmental NGO Network (CENN), and Association for Protection of Landowners Rights (APLR): Environmental consulting firms involved in the ESIA.